Here is professor Pinar's speach:
Not only in the United States, we educators have suffered a history of curriculum development predicated primarily on functionality. Over the past century there have been several such formulations in the United States – each is associated with a key theoretician (Jackson 1992) – that link the curriculum to the economy and to society. In both cases these links are future-bound, although curriculum conservatives – focused on the ancient languages and cultures – did survive in the U.S. through the 1920s, resurfacing briefly (mostly rhetorically) in the 1980s. To achieve these functional objectives, curriculum development became primarily procedural and systematized, starting with objectives, and thanks to Ralph Tyler, ending with assessment. In linking objectives to assessment, teaching was reduced to implementation.